Lionches
.
- Jan 17, 2012
- 649
- 166
Are you planning on releasing that tool?Wassup guys. I'd just want to brag a lil' bit.. .
Can't wait to get back!
Are you planning on releasing that tool?Wassup guys. I'd just want to brag a lil' bit.. .
Can't wait to get back!
It's a development thread, plus it's months away from being released.Hi yall where do I download this?
Nope, sorry. I'm not trying to be some god-person for not to be releasing it. If I release it, Sulake will patch it.Are you planning on releasing that tool?
It's ok, good luck with development, though!Nope, sorry. I'm not trying to be some god-person for not to be releasing it. If I release it, Sulake will patch it.
I guess you can make it a binary and encrypt that binary.
Yeah, good idea. Me 'n Zak will talk abou' itI have a better idea. Make it create an XML file with the headers, put the XML file onYou must be registered for see linksand make the emulator checkYou must be registered for see linkswith a key ( so not everyone can get it if you'd like ), if key exists, fetch XML.
I have a better idea. Make it create an XML file with the headers, put the XML file onYou must be registered for see linksand make the emulator checkYou must be registered for see linkswith a key ( so not everyone can get it if you'd like ), if key exists, fetch XML.
He showed me on Skype before the development was posted.You must be registered for see links:
bools1? What is bools1? Sorry, you're tool is just a copy of Droppy and mine, and you edit it a bit and think it's your program.
You denmark faggot.
I don't see your code copyrighted or released under a license. So good luck proving it's yours.'My'? He is using our product to look cool, but he didn't code it.
The reason Mikkel use it because he is faggot and can't code, he is a little noob.I don't see your code copyrighted or released under a license. So good luck proving it's yours.
The reason Mikkel use it because he is faggot and can't code, he is a little noob.
I might ask Droppy to find out a way to proove it, because we coded it.
There is no emulator that takes 1 month to do. (Well, there is. But it'll be very badly written).I don't think this will ever get released or finished if you ask me.
Never no big updates, i supported RevEMU from the start but now it's just taking to long.
I don't think UberEMU failed. I think it the reason we have great emulators today...Just looking through the files of RevEMU on github should be enough evidence that it is still being coded, and it is being coded for stability and features. If you want it could turn into UberEMU or Snowlight which both failed. The only emulator around that is actually stable and worth it is Butterfly. But Rev will change that. Just wait...