Habbo 2 VPS
- Thread starter Linxon
- Start date
JayC
Always Learning
- Aug 8, 2013
- 5,493
- 1,398
There shouldn't be much lagg because everything gets cached (for the most part). I think his server specs are just far too low .
Zaka
Programmer
- Feb 9, 2012
- 471
- 121
Well that obviously depends on what cms he uses and how often the cms gets new information from the database. Also it could be the position of the servers. If the servers are not in the same continent as each other it might aswell be a factor.
@Linxon what are your server specs?
Zaka
Programmer
- Feb 9, 2012
- 471
- 121
I think if you put the database on the same server as the cms, the website will be much quicker.
MayoMayn
BestDev
- Oct 18, 2016
- 1,423
- 683
It will be a lot faster. Cant see the idea of having 2 VPS unless the first one is a Linux and the other one is Windows.Oh, okey.. I will try that!
Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
MayoMayn
BestDev
- Oct 18, 2016
- 1,423
- 683
Indeed. I use NGINX with HHVM on my demo hotel for my CMS, and my loading speed went 8x faster than with Apache. Current loading speed is approximately 0.000067 seconds on the index page.
Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
Zaka
Programmer
- Feb 9, 2012
- 471
- 121
Hahaha, honestly, this really made me laugh. Security isn't just about paying; Or it depends, you can pay someone and he will try his best to make it as secure as possible, but 2 servers doesn't increase the security in any way?
Zaka
Programmer
- Feb 9, 2012
- 471
- 121
No, because if the server is not strong enough (network, not ram), then the server will go down anyhow. And when it does, the whole hotel will go down with it, because both servers are dependent on each other.Its better than tcp proxy in client.php
Blasteh
Lord Farquaad
- Apr 3, 2013
- 1,151
- 513
You could pay $1000 for a server, you can still go down. The more you pay doesn't mean you're 100% secure or 100% uptime. As @Zaka said, the servers are dependent on each other. You're wasting your money because if one goes down, the other is useless until the other comes back online. Whether it's a DDoS attack, network issue (host related or not), you forget to pay your bill, or any other reason; you still need the other server. So why not just have one?
JayC
Always Learning
- Aug 8, 2013
- 5,493
- 1,398
2 Servers is less of a security issue with DDOS'ing and more of a security issue with data. You want your data on separate servers so that if someone does attempt to attack your main server - the information they will get would not help them. Security breach on main server would give you time to fix how they breached before they got any data.
Core
Member
- Nov 10, 2016
- 356
- 138
Why would you do that though when it's the emulator which is resource intensive?
Damien
Don't need glasses if you can C#
- Feb 26, 2012
- 426
- 642
To get that lightning fast speed on you cms, duh! The emulators pointless if you can knock half a second of loading time.
I don't know about you, but when I play retros I spend most my time looking at the cms. Amateurs!
Jaden
not so active
- Aug 24, 2014
- 886
- 263
You're most likely using the wrong CMS for a setup like this.
Think about how poorly RevCMS is written, and how AWFUL developers in this community add onto it just by neglecting the fact that it has a database class and an existing connection thus reverting to prehistoric mysql_* functions + establishing another MySQL connection... it produces a lot of unnecessary overhead.
There is minimal to no caching at all, so you're dependent upon raw MySQL queries for each page load.
Considering all of this you'll obviously need a strong connection with your MySQL server.
My advice would be to leave your MySQL server on your emulator server (your emulator is priority and it would make the most sense for it to use more of your database) and to use a CMS that caches, as much as you can for CMS content stored in the database and a user once they login.
Think about how poorly RevCMS is written, and how AWFUL developers in this community add onto it just by neglecting the fact that it has a database class and an existing connection thus reverting to prehistoric mysql_* functions + establishing another MySQL connection... it produces a lot of unnecessary overhead.
There is minimal to no caching at all, so you're dependent upon raw MySQL queries for each page load.
Considering all of this you'll obviously need a strong connection with your MySQL server.
My advice would be to leave your MySQL server on your emulator server (your emulator is priority and it would make the most sense for it to use more of your database) and to use a CMS that caches, as much as you can for CMS content stored in the database and a user once they login.
