Remove Rev?

[lepos]

Kryptos was the lead developer for the 'rev development' type section:

You must be registered for see links

Since he's left the section is pretty dead and despite him saying that he's completing it, I don't think the section is as focused as it was previously.

You could of course make a read-only (dead projects) section and put it there so people can still read the help threads and so on or just bang out remove it and he can still finish and post the development in the Habbo one.

Unless of course it's still a devoted Community Project.
Feel free to post your opinions, negativity is welcome.

 

[Legion]

I would like to say, I wouldn't mind learning PHP then using it to work on RevCMS

 

[Leader]

Rev has died since 3.0 came out. I think 3.0 was a major failure because it was simply to powerful, without a lot of core features and design. I agree with you, It has died down a lot. So +1 to the vote saying kick it out

 

[Sledmore]

Rev has died since 3.0 came out. I think 3.0 was a major failure because it was simply to powerful, without a lot of core features and design. I agree with you, It has died down a lot. So +1 to the vote saying kick it out

It hasn't died as a whole, but I said to Manuel myself that it does seem simply too much for most users, RevCMS 1.9.9.9 was perfection in my eyes, but ever since 3.x.x Rev has slowly began to fall down hill. Unless it is to be worked on more, I'd also say to maybe move to a normal development thread, unsure yet, Manuel is busy with life/school(or college), like most of us.

 

[Beast]

It hasn't died as a whole, but I said to Manuel myself that it does seem simply too much for most users, RevCMS 1.9.9.9 was perfection in my eyes, but ever since 3.x.x Rev has slowly began to fall down hill. Unless it is to be worked on more, I'd also say to maybe move to a normal development thread, unsure yet, Manuel is busy with life/school(or college), like most of us.

All is true. 3.x.x was a major want at first once it was released it was a fail because of all the bugs that needed to be fixed unless someone is willing to take out time and fix it but honestly 1.9.9 is better anyways! Also I agree it should be a normal thread now.

 

[lepos]

It hasn't died as a whole, but I said to Manuel myself that it does seem simply too much for most users, RevCMS 1.9.9.9 was perfection in my eyes, but ever since 3.x.x Rev has slowly began to fall down hill. Unless it is to be worked on more, I'd also say to maybe move to a normal development thread, unsure yet, Manuel is busy with life/school(or college), like most of us.

Couldn't of said it better myself, I agree with it just being moved to a normal development section.

 

[Kieren]

I'm sure Manual will start the project as he left it when he has more time on his hands the RevCMS has became a great development throughout the months and it'll be a shame to see it go. I can assure someone will start with it's development again in the future, for now we just need to leave it to dust for a while for Manual to decide on what to do with it as it's he's project.

 

[lepos]

I'm sure Manual will start the project as he left it when he has more time on his hands the RevCMS has became a great development throughout the months and it'll be a shame to see it go. I can assure someone will start with it's development again in the future, for now we just need to leave it to dust for a while for Manual to decide on what to do with it as it's he's project.

I guess so.

I just don't want to see another dead section, hope

You must be registered for see links

comes back soon and continues it.

 

[Leader]

I'm sure Manual will start the project as he left it when he has more time on his hands the RevCMS has became a great development throughout the months and it'll be a shame to see it go. I can assure someone will start with it's development again in the future, for now we just need to leave it to dust for a while for Manual to decide on what to do with it as it's he's project.

Hopefully, I used to be a big fan of it till he lost time to keep up on it... -cries

 

[Kryptos]

I think Rev was just too much for the scene. It isn't a failure in my opinion, I released a BETA so everyone would be aware the would be a lot of bugs. I think Rev 3 is just too powerful, it's too professional for a community that's used to procedural style and messy shit.

I promise I will finish it, when the time is right.

 

[lepos]

I think Rev was just too much for the scene. It isn't a failure in my opinion, I released a BETA so everyone would be aware the would be a lot of bugs. I think Rev 3 is just too powerful, it's too professional for a community that's used to procedural style and messy shit.

I promise I will finish it, when the time is right.

I didn't mean exactly if you were finishing or not but in all respects, is rev still that if I may say; popular, big or whatever, that it continues to need a whole section for the development?

I hope you see where I'm coming from :S

 

[Kryptos]

I didn't mean exactly if you were finishing or not but in all respects, is rev still that if I may say; popular, big or whatever, that it continues to need a whole section for the development?

I hope you see where I'm coming from :S

It is a community project, other projects can be too? It's not stopping anything.

 

[lepos]

It is a community project, other projects can be too? It's not stopping anything.

Fair enough, it was just an idea that I still see fit but I guess you're somewhat right.

 

[Queef]

All is true. 3.x.x was a major want at first once it was released it was a fail because of all the bugs that needed to be fixed unless someone is willing to take out time and fix it but honestly 1.9.9 is better anyways! Also I agree it should be a normal thread now.

Why do you think rev 3 BETA was released? To find bugs as Kryptos just said, that's the whole point of a beta. Your saying it like Kryptos released the beta and just threw it aside. Kryptos was taking time out to fix bugs, he was releasing new versions of the beta every other day. You can't call a project in BETA stages a fail based on the terms that it has bugs.

As he just said, he will finish it eventually but from what i've read previously he's lost motivation in the project whether that be the cause of reactions or other things happening right now i don't blame him. When he released the beta all i saw were people putting down the project because it had bugs even though its a beta. Rev 3 has been in dev for over a year, it might not be as you expected but a simple "good job" probably goes a long way these days.

 

[Beast]

Why do you think rev 3 BETA was released? To find bugs as Kryptos just said, that's the whole point of a beta. Your saying it like Kryptos released the beta and just threw it aside. Kryptos was taking time out to fix bugs, he was releasing new versions of the beta every other day. You can't call a project in BETA stages a fail based on the terms that it has bugs.

As he just said, he will finish it eventually but from what i've read previously he's lost motivation in the project whether that be the cause of reactions or other things happening right now i don't blame him. When he released the beta all i saw were people putting down the project because it had bugs even though its a beta. Rev 3 has been in dev for over a year, it might not be as you expected but a simple "good job" probably goes a long way these days.

Fag, I was on about the inactivity due to the lack of updates to rev 3 hence why we wanted the section removed but as Kryptos said he is still alive so fair enough.

 

[Queef]

All is true. 3.x.x was a major want at first once it was released it was a fail because of all the bugs that needed to be fixed.

 

[Beast]

And due to the lack of updates bud, not sure if you knew Kryptos didn't release much fix's after he released 3.x.x and it died out due to it.

 

[Queef]

And due to the lack of updates bud, not sure if you knew Kryptos didn't release much fix's after he released 3.x.x and it died out due to it.

He released 3 or 4 in 1 week each containing quite a large amount of fixes.

 

[Doctorate]

Hold it.
Kick it out but keep an archive thread so people can download it..
It still is about the most secure cms?

 

[lepos]

I think we've all made our point about why we think it should be removed or not.

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

or anyone close thread; they've seen the thread so they'll choose (whenever) if it gets removed.