Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kaz" data-source="post: 366266" data-attributes="member: 1611">Whether they are online or not. It needs to runBasically the user will have energy, max_energy, stamina &amp; max_staminaIf the users current stamina is less than max_stamina, + 1 it when their time is due. If they are equal, do nothing. Same for energy.However user 1, may have their times as followed: energy, increases every 5 minutes, and stamina increases every 4 mins 20User 2 however, may have these times: energy, increases every 4 mins 20, and stamina increases every 3 mins 50.And the remaining users may have energy and stamina both at 5mins due to them being inactive.Which leads me back to the questions would I need to have multiple crons set for each 'timer'?Would that not mean I would need to have a cron set every second? Simply due to the fact that not all users will have the same updated timestamp, as updating said field (more info in my response to rasta) would need to happen as and when the time reaches zero, ready to restart its loop from said users timer, rather than updating when a check is in place as it would not be instant</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kaz, post: 366266, member: 1611"] Whether they are online or not. It needs to run Basically the user will have energy, max_energy, stamina & max_stamina If the users current stamina is less than max_stamina, + 1 it when their time is due. If they are equal, do nothing. Same for energy. However user 1, may have their times as followed: energy, increases every 5 minutes, and stamina increases every 4 mins 20 User 2 however, may have these times: energy, increases every 4 mins 20, and stamina increases every 3 mins 50. And the remaining users may have energy and stamina both at 5mins due to them being inactive. Which leads me back to the questions would I need to have multiple crons set for each 'timer'? Would that not mean I would need to have a cron set every second? Simply due to the fact that not all users will have the same updated timestamp, as updating said field (more info in my response to rasta) would need to happen as and when the time reaches zero, ready to restart its loop from said users timer, rather than updating when a check is in place as it would not be instant [/QUOTE]

Verification

Reply to thread

Connect with us

Newest members