Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RastaLulz" data-source="post: 206038" data-attributes="member: 1">I'm trying to be as nice as possible, but do you really not understand how the term &quot;terrorist attack&quot; works? It's up to the (Western) Government to use the term, which of whom are at war in the Middle East. Of course they're going to call anyone who attacks them (in a direct or non-direct way) a terrorist, as that is a blanket term for anyone we are at war with. It's similar to how the Boston bombers are &quot;terrorists&quot;, yet if some white guy shoots up a movie theater they're a murder. In both cases it's murder, but in one it's because the individual(s) did it because of the &quot;war on terror&quot;.&nbsp;Also, you don't think that if per say the Bible belt (South) of the U.S. was attacked by a superior military, they wouldn't fight back, in the name of their God, who they think is all mighty, and all powerful? You're only seeing this issue from one side, and not both.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RastaLulz, post: 206038, member: 1"] I'm trying to be as nice as possible, but do you really not understand how the term "terrorist attack" works? It's up to the (Western) Government to use the term, which of whom are at war in the Middle East. Of course they're going to call anyone who attacks them (in a direct or non-direct way) a terrorist, as that is a blanket term for anyone we are at war with. It's similar to how the Boston bombers are "terrorists", yet if some white guy shoots up a movie theater they're a murder. In both cases it's murder, but in one it's because the individual(s) did it because of the "war on terror". Also, you don't think that if per say the Bible belt (South) of the U.S. was attacked by a superior military, they wouldn't fight back, in the name of their God, who they think is all mighty, and all powerful? You're only seeing this issue from one side, and not both. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Reply to thread

Connect with us

Newest members