Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Parsov" data-source="post: 470611" data-attributes="member: 68429">
<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Easier to find Unity Developers within this Industry</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Having Unity Developers &amp; Maintaining Unity is cost efficient</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">They save time</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Was somewhat a new approach that Sulake took making it a bit different &amp; difficult in some cases for this private server community </li>
</ul>Everything would be better if it was made In-House. However it costs a lot of money to hire these kind of experienced developers. They don't even use an In-House Game Server let alone Engine. I guess it's a good alternative to build on top of things since it saves a lot of time and money especially when you use a widely used Engine like Unity.My thoughts are mixed on this one. They could've nailed the Unity project. It's not a bad choice for a Game like Habbo. I think they rushed it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Parsov, post: 470611, member: 68429"] [LIST] [*]Easier to find Unity Developers within this Industry [*]Having Unity Developers & Maintaining Unity is cost efficient [*]They save time [*]Was somewhat a new approach that Sulake took making it a bit different & difficult in some cases for this private server community [/LIST] Everything would be better if it was made In-House. However it costs a lot of money to hire these kind of experienced developers. They don't even use an In-House Game Server let alone Engine. I guess it's a good alternative to build on top of things since it saves a lot of time and money especially when you use a widely used Engine like Unity. My thoughts are mixed on this one. They could've nailed the Unity project. It's not a bad choice for a Game like Habbo. I think they rushed it. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Reply to thread

Connect with us

Newest members