Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Weasel" data-source="post: 464453" data-attributes="member: 9520">Alright, I'm going to break down something and indulge you in an answer about this once, as it actually also fits in with your other remarks. To be honest, I'm neutral when it comes to the Habbo section. However, I do see some issues with this. There's a difference between an active forum based on posts and on users. There's a lot of Help threads in the Habbo Section, but that's about it. There's no proper active development, no special releases (mostly themes and furni, etc), and a lot of those users only tend to come online when they require help, and some of them even delete their content after the question has been answered. Is this the kind of activity we want?And that's not even everything. The amount of toxicity and rule-breaking happening in that section is more than in any other place. To top that off, as your example is a great one, most people who receive a warning in that section always think they are above the rules. So this ties into your &quot;proved point&quot;, you're actually proving my point. Within the OP, it states clearly this is not a place to debate the staff team. I already skipped on giving you a warning because I wanted this to be an open forum, and only removed the part of your post that did not fit in here. But still, even after a staff member (in this case, me) alters it, you still want to be above it and post it again.It's been said before, and it's not going to change. People who have complaints about a certain staff member can forward this complaint to the appropriate level of Staff (MODs-&gt;SenMODs, SenMODs -&gt; SuperMODs, SuperMODs -&gt; Admins). It's been like this for years. So I wouldn't say bullish moderation is the issue, but people knowingly breaking the rules is. That's your definitive answer about moderation in this thread. Feel free to discuss the rest of the message.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Weasel, post: 464453, member: 9520"] Alright, I'm going to break down something and indulge you in an answer about this once, as it actually also fits in with your other remarks. To be honest, I'm neutral when it comes to the Habbo section. However, I do see some issues with this. There's a difference between an active forum based on posts and on users. There's a lot of Help threads in the Habbo Section, but that's about it. There's no proper active development, no special releases (mostly themes and furni, etc), and a lot of those users only tend to come online when they require help, and some of them even delete their content after the question has been answered. Is this the kind of activity we want? And that's not even everything. The amount of toxicity and rule-breaking happening in that section is more than in any other place. To top that off, as your example is a great one, most people who receive a warning in that section always think they are above the rules. So this ties into your "proved point", you're actually proving my point. Within the OP, it states clearly this is not a place to debate the staff team. I already skipped on giving you a warning because I wanted this to be an open forum, and only removed the part of your post that did not fit in here. But still, even after a staff member (in this case, me) alters it, you still want to be above it and post it again. It's been said before, and it's not going to change. People who have complaints about a certain staff member can forward this complaint to the appropriate level of Staff (MODs->SenMODs, SenMODs -> SuperMODs, SuperMODs -> Admins). It's been like this for years. So I wouldn't say bullish moderation is the issue, but people knowingly breaking the rules is. That's your definitive answer about moderation in this thread. Feel free to discuss the rest of the message. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Reply to thread

Connect with us

Newest members