Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LeChris" data-source="post: 300616" data-attributes="member: 37998">Everyone is bound to use Reality, when the good Butterfly based emulators are closed source at the moment (Including the released version of ZapRP.)&nbsp; The few emulators based around BcStorm, Plus, etc are very poorly coded, and often contain memory leaks, backdoors, etc so most people tend to stay away from them as they're even more unstable than the Reality ones.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Reality is based on Snowlight, which was already coded unstable, so it's something you have to live with, act like Fabbo and operate on servers that are way over budget for any regular hotel owner.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Anyways, if I ever get into C# again...I most likely will base Project Cry on Butterfly r96, as per SierraEMU being out of the question due to it not being as stable on my computer, as Butterfly was thus making me believe Sierra being the less powerful emulator.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LeChris, post: 300616, member: 37998"] Everyone is bound to use Reality, when the good Butterfly based emulators are closed source at the moment (Including the released version of ZapRP.) The few emulators based around BcStorm, Plus, etc are very poorly coded, and often contain memory leaks, backdoors, etc so most people tend to stay away from them as they're even more unstable than the Reality ones. Reality is based on Snowlight, which was already coded unstable, so it's something you have to live with, act like Fabbo and operate on servers that are way over budget for any regular hotel owner. Anyways, if I ever get into C# again...I most likely will base Project Cry on Butterfly r96, as per SierraEMU being out of the question due to it not being as stable on my computer, as Butterfly was thus making me believe Sierra being the less powerful emulator. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Reply to thread

Connect with us

Newest members