of course you like the idea, you came up with it.Posting ranks like for every so many posts you get a rank.
Example:
1 post= Newbie
30 posts= Keeper
2,000 posts= Dedicated User
20,000= Maybe high roller Sub?
I like this idea very much. Tell me what you think?
of course you like the idea, you came up with it.
There needs to be more inbetween imo. But its already been suggested before many of times.
well adding 30 contributing to the idea, meaning if the idea does get implemented, there will already be potential ideas.Those were just some examples some others like Posting Freak, Crazy Poster, and such. Didn't wanna do like 30
I know, it's far way off so unlocking the full features of the forum might be alright? It will take ages I guess. Or reduce it? Up toI think this is pointless, nobody is near 30,000 posts so why are you talking about it?
I also pay for sub to edit my user title, I don't want everyone have a different user title based on their post count.
Not unless we do not aim for it and suprisingly gets it.this type of stuff brings alot of spam and useless posts.
If ever you're planning with the next rank, would it color like the posting freaks and what will they get unlocked? Reached 1,700 posts unexpectedly.I don't really see the need for a new rank at this current moment, as the only people with a high amount of posts are staff.
If anything, the next rank will be at 1,500 posts and then probably not another until 3,000, and so on.
In forums, most people don't "surprisingly" reach a number of posts.Not unless we do not aim for it and suprisingly gets it.
Posting ranks are like bit 'rewards' in what I can see for being 'helpful' around the community and participating on different user-initiated discussions. However you got a point that it may start users to post non-sense, there is a 'Report' button then bam the authority will do what is appropriate to do so.In forums, most people don't "surprisingly" reach a number of posts.
Thanks/likes, reputation and post rankings are among things that brings spam on a forum because people get a hard on over their e-fame. Maybe not you, but alot of people yes. That's why having only thanks is a good thing and I don't see a positive side of having posting ranks.
Don't see the point in new ranks, people'll just start spamming.
Yah, we shouldn't only base on post but also on activity, participation and such.That's what we're here for, suggestions would still be nice. The other handYou must be registered for see linksis right we don't really need them at the moment. Couple of months back I did suggest a contribute rank for those who join in events and help other members out (known as well committed members on the forums) If we could make member ranks like that then each rank could differ and actually mean something. Instead of the boring Silver, Gold etc..