Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ecko" data-source="post: 367218" data-attributes="member: 24874">Then why, after this thread had already been split, would you go back and say in simplest terms Linux is the OS (which it is not)? I mean the thread was split for a reason, to discuss if Linux is an OS. After numerous people tried to make you understand that calling the kernel an operating system is invalid, you finally conceded that you were using the wrong terminology. Then a few days later, you go back to calling Linux an OS. Then a few minutes later, you post this:"It's not technically an OS".You flip-flop more than political candidates. We already know you're going to respond with some disingenuous post, but the fact of the matter is you know Linux is not an OS (in your own words), yet you continue to call it an OS. It doesn't matter if less informed people call it an OS. You call it an OS when you know it's not.</blockquote>