Considering you edited your post to change the word "version" to "build" yesterday, you must clearly think they are synonymous:
https://devbest.com/threads/revolution-server-java-production.79028/#post-378428 <- edited post...
Arguing semantics now? I thought you were a "developer"? In what world are version and build not synonymous when discussing any type of application development? Why haven't you answered my question about where you work?
inb4 another excuse/deflection/whiny comment
Don't think I've ever called myself a developer.
Seem to be contradicting yourself.
Is there anyone here who even respects you...? You're like the new Brackson, just with more excuses.
Also, I don't work at IBM?? But if you want to talk about jobs, where is it that you actually work? Oh wait...
Has nothing to do with releasing a version like that and everything to do with the fact that in one post you call it secure when its clearly visible that plaintext passwords are being stored. Then in the next post say it was by design (why?). Why in the world do you have a "version" which does...
No, I'm laughing at the fact you called something secure while storing passwords in plaintext (regardless of when it was). It takes less than a minute to add some basic form of hashing, so there really should be no reason you have a "version" that stores plaintext passwords.
But hey, by all...
Oh, I get it now. You purposefully made a version that stored passwords in plaintext. Gotcha.
"definitely secure"
"but just this one portion I am referring to"